PAFI Annual General Assembly Meeting 2014

Ambassador Jaime S. Bautista, Doctor of Laws

jaime@jaimesbautista.com

PAFI ANNUAL GENERAL ASSEMBLY MEETING

The Philippine Ambassadors Foundation Incorporated (PAFI) invites all Philippine Ambassadors/Chiefs of Mission to take part in its Annual General Meeting on Tuesday, 14 January 2013 at 2:00 PM at the Department of Foreign Affairs’ 14^th Floor, to discuss its program of activities for 2014 and a vision of the Philippines’ place in the 21^st Century.  The invitation includes all those in the active service.

Throughout 2013, PAFI looked into relevant issues relating to foreign affairs such as the conflict in Sabah last February where there was a standoff between the Malaysian and Sulu Sultanate forces resulting in actual use of force.  On this sensitive issue, PAFI adopted a Resolution, advocating three principles:  First, PAFI expressed its concern for the safety of Filipinos and loss of lives in Sabah.  Second, PAFI called on the Malaysian Government and the Sultanate of Sulu to engage in peaceful dialogue and exercise maximum restraint instead of use of force.  And third, PAFI urged the Philippine Government to resume talks, in accordance with the Manila Accord of 1963, to resolve the issue of the historic and legal rights to Sabah of the Republic of the Philippines and the Sultanate of Sulu.

Apart from press releases by Ambassador Clemencio T. Montesa, the PAFI position was also communicated by its Chairman, Ambassador Lauro L. Baja, Jr., at the roundtable discussion hosted by the Asian Institute of Journalism and Communications and the Now Planet TV Internet Program moderated by Ambassador Jose V. Romero, Jr., at interviews with UNTV and GNN, and at a UP forum sponsored by the Asian Center, UP Political Science Department, and the Institute of Islamic studies, where the former also expressed his own personal views.

In May, with the election of H. E. Hassan Rouhani as Iran’s new President, PAFI’s Chairman was approached by the Iranian Ambassador with the proposal that PAFI and Iran’s counterpart association establish ties in order to encourage bilateral trade and economic cooperation in view of the new political climate in Iran.   Recently, the British have been active to upgrade their relations with Iran, for strategic and economic reasons.  PAFI is open to establishing such ties with Iran’s association as well as with relevant associations of other countries, in accordance with PAFI’s mission.

PAFI examined other issues, particularly migration, peace and development, the subjects of a symposium last June co-sponsored by PAFI and DFA/OUMWA (Office of the Undersecretary for Migrant Workers’ Affairs headed by Undersecretary Jesus Yabes).  As a prelude to the symposium, Ambassador Rosalinda V. Tirona (the Symposium’s Chairman) interviewed Ambassadors Montesa, Willy Gaa, and Baja in her Kalinga TV Internet Program on their experiences in assisting Filipino nationals during their tours of duty abroad.

 The signing of the “Agreement on Mass Media Cooperation between PAFI and the  Manila Times” last May has allowed PAFI to be more visible and productive.  This was an initiative of Mr. Dante Ang II, Manila Times president and CEO, and Ambassador Jose V. Romero, Jr.  Through the publication every Saturday of the “Ambassadors’ Corner”, PAFI’s members have expressed their personal opinions on a wide range of subjects, including Sabah, the Framework Agreement on Bangsamoro, the Syrian crisis, the Visiting Forces Agreement and the US Pivot to Asia, the Russian Pivot to the New Asia, the West Philippine Sea/Spratlys and Arbitration by ITLOS (International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea), the evolving concept of Sovereignty over natural resources, the ASEAN Economic Community 2015, ASEAN- China Cooperation in the Mekong River, Development Diplomacy and Poverty Alleviation, Obamacare and the RH Bill, the Perils of Privatization creating monopolies and restrictive policies increasing the cost of electricity, and Climate Change and Disaster Risk Reduction. 

Ambassador Amado S. Tolentino’s series of three articles relating to climate change suggests the need for more effective environmental diplomacy in response to Yolanda.  More directly, Ambassador Jose M. Zaldarriaga took charge of PAFI’s donation to the Yolanda victims, purchasing at a discount the 28 packs of food consisting of rice, sardines and assorted goods, and entrusting them to LDC for quick delivery to the super-typhoon victims.

With respect to protecting our nation’s historic buildings, the year 2013 finally saw the approval by the National Historical Commission of the Philippines of a historical marker for the Fujimi property in Tokyo.  This was a special project of Ambassador Macario Laurel IV, which was followed up with the Commission by Ambassador Eusebio Abaquin.  PAFI has commended Senator Aquilino Pimentel and Finance Secretary Cesar V. Purisima for their particular roles in preserving this historic cultural heritage.   

Last November, PAFI entered into a Memorandum of Cooperation (MOC) with the Philippine Council on Foreign Relations to cooperate in the organization or sponsorships of conferences, seminars, public dialogue and lectures and exchanges of relevant information and expertise on certain fields, in view of their mutual interests in the fields of diplomacy and international relations.  PAFI also has a Memorandum of Understanding on Academic Cooperation with the Foreign Service Institute of the Philippines.  Ambassador Gaa drafted the MOC and the Commendations.

PAFI’s Board of Governors is composed of the following: Chairman Emeritus, Alfonso T. Yuchengco (Immediate Past Chairman); Chairman, Lauro L. Baja, Jr.; President, Jose M. Zaldarriaga; First Vice President, Jose V. Romero, Jr.; Second Vice President, Rosalinda V. Tirona; Auditor, Amado S. Tolentino; Legal Counsel, Willy C. Gaa; Press Officer, Clemencio F. Montesa; Members/Governors, Jose Macario Laurel IV (Immediate Past President), Antonio P. Villamor, and Estrella A. Berenguel; Secretary General, Jaime S. Bautista (Acting Treasurer).  

 The present Officers/Governors of PAFI were sworn in by Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario last 24 May 2013, on which occasion he shared information on the latest international developments affecting Philippine interests.  The members of the Board offered comments.

On Bangsamoro Identity

Ambassador Jaime S. Bautista, Doctor of laws

jaime@jaimesbautista.com

ON THE BANGSAMORO IDENTITY

The completion of the peace process with the Muslim Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) in 2014 appears to be a priority task of the Philippine Government because the absence of peace and security has hampered development in Mindanao and is one of the root causes of poverty in parts of Mindanao.

The early conclusion of the peace agreement may also allow the whole country to benefit more fully from the ASEAN Economic Community scheduled to be in place by the end of 2015, by taking advantage of the southern Philippines’ geographical proximity to Brunei, Indonesia and  Malaysia for trade/transport corridors, developing Mindanao as a breadbasket for the BIMP/EAGA (Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia, Philippines - East ASEAN Growth Area) and promoting tourism for Archipelagic ASEAN.  

The Framework Agreement on the Bangsamoro (FAB) has sought to create a new political entity (NPE) acceptable to the MILF, but without conceding statehood to this NPE, which would pose a threat to the territorial integrity of the Republic of the Philippines.

During the twentieth century, the constituent states of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia succeeded in obtaining independence.  Many other entities aspired to statehood but without success, among which was the Euskadi Ta Askatasuna (Basque Homeland and Freedom or ETA), the armed terrorist organization in the Basque autonomous region of Spain. 

A more recent example of an entity wishing to obtain statehood and independence is the Independentisme Catala, a separatist movement in Catalonia located in northeast Spain.  Spain is governed by its 1978 Constitution and has a unitary government with a Parliament in Madrid. The Central Government has devolved self-governance to its 17 autonomous regions in accordance with the Constitution but none of them can unilaterally break away.

Catalonia has a population of 7.5 million people and is composed of four provinces, including Barcelona where the regional Parliament is located and where the movement has the strongest support.    Last December, Catalan President Artur Mas announced that the four pro-independence parties, which hold a majority in the regional Parliament, had agreed to hold a referendum on 9 November 2014, which would ask Catalan voters a two-part referendum question:  Do you want Catalonia to become a state?  Do you want that state to be independent?  He explained that this date was chosen to allow for discussions with the Spanish government “to stage the consultation legally.”

The Spanish Prime Minister, Mariano Rajoy replied that the referendum would be considered illegal and that any discussion or debate on this was out of the question.  The position of the Spanish government is that this referendum requires prior constitutional procedures and authorization by the State, and is a matter for every Spanish citizen to be consulted because it is up to all the Spanish citizens to determine the territorial organization of the State.

Support for Catalan independence is attributed to the notion that Catalonia is a nation, derived from contemporary political and cultural ideology based on the history of Catalonia, the Catalan language, and Catalan traditions.  However, in a judgment dated 28 June 2010, the Constitutional Court of  

Spain declared as without any legal effect references to “Catalonia as a nation” and the “national reality of Catalonia” expressed in the 2006 Statute of Autonomy of Catalonia.  

The Court also ruled that under the Spanish constitution, only the Spanish nationality is recognized although there is provision in the Spanish Constitution that makes reference to nationalities and regions, which composes the Spanish nation.  This reference is found in Article 2 which provides: “The Constitution is based on the indissoluble unity of the Spanish Nation, the common and indivisible country of all Spaniards; it recognizes and guarantees the right to autonomy of the nationalities and regions of which it is composed, and solidarity amongst them all.” Interpreting this reference to “nationalities” in Article 2, the Court, held that this was a historical and cultural term and had no legal weight, and that Spain remained the only nation recognized by the Constitution.

Holding up the erroneous example that Catalans enjoy both Spanish and Catalonian nationalities, some argued that Philippine laws should recognize a nationality for the new political entity, alongside Philippine citizenship. The recognition of the “Bangsamoro Identity” in FAB appears to be a compromise by diluting its homogenous identity and providing it with considerable ethnic and linguistic variety but its legal consequences surely need to be spelled out to define it as a historical and cultural term in relation to the ancestral domain issue.  This is necessary because there has been an effort to clothe the Bangsamoro with the elements of statehood. The FAB, for example, speaks of the Bangsamoro with a population possessing Bangsamoro Identity, with a defined territory including a maritime and aerial domain, and a Parliamentary government whose relationship with the Central Government is asymmetric and whose accountability is primarily to its constituents.

The Bangsamoro Identity is an important issue because the notion of a separate nation may be used in the future to promote independence for the autonomous region.   There should be safeguards in the Bangsamoro Basic Law to ensure that it recognizes only one nationality and the indissoluble unity of the Philippine nation as a continuing unifying force for the entire Philippine archipelago and that the Central Government shall have exclusive powers on citizenship and naturalization, and making it abundantly clear that the Bangsamoro Basic Law is subject to the provisions of the Philippine Constitution.  It may also be desirable that in the Bangsamoro Basic Law, the term “legitimate grievances “ be avoided and that instead, it should contain a preamble that the Bangsamoro aspires to establish reconciliation and integration, and to strengthen the historical, cultural, linguistic and ethnic bonds existing among all Filipinos, whether Muslim or Christian or of another religion or ideology, so as to promote their quality of life and their happiness.